Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Kentico Product Ideas » On-line Marketing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  2. 144 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    14 comments  ·  Kentico Product Ideas » Content Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hello,

    we are exploring the options on how to limit widgets that can be added to various zones that are available to content editors on the whole web.

    Limiting widgets per zone is one of the most considered options.

    (Please note that the main focus is on the MVC devleopment model)

    If you have any suggestions on what possibilities to limit widgets you would appreciate, please leave a comment below!

    David Komarek
    Product Owner

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 28 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Kentico Product Ideas » On-line Marketing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I too come across this request from customers often. These Social tags are so important now, there needs to be more support in Kentico.

    I can think of multiple options this can be implemented:
    1. add fields and values for the various tags (og:title, of:image, etc) on the Metadata section of a Page
    2. Expand the Page Type with a new section so on a Page Type level a developer can indicate which fields, hold the values for the tags, this way you can reuse the DocumentName for og:title, TeaserImage for og:image etc.)
    3. A combination of the two: Indicate on the PageType which fields are the defaults, but be able to override this on the Metadata tab.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 27 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Share your thoughts  ·  1 comment  ·  Kentico Product Ideas » Platform  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 26 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Kentico Product Ideas » On-line Marketing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi Ilesh, I agree with you that within Forms module there can be a lot of UX improvements. Path or URL selector is definitely nice improvement for Redirect to URL field. Waiting for more votes. Thank you!

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 28 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Kentico Product Ideas » Platform  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 35 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Kentico Product Ideas » Content Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 54 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Kentico Product Ideas » Content Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 72 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Kentico Product Ideas » Content Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hello!

    We are currently exploring the possibility to cover this idea. There are few questions related to Canonical links I’d like to ask:

    Do you prefer this feature to automatically cover most used scenarios (such as redirections) or do you prefer manual control of Canonical links?

    Automatically:

    If automatically, what would be the top required scenarios for your projects?

    Is the primary concern the variant of the URL (like http vs https, trailing slash vs non-trailing slash?

    How do you want to specify the format of the canonical link globally?

    Manually:

    If manually, then do you consider the Content editor to specify the canonical link using a selector or URL manually?

    Is the primary concern a page alias created for a page?

    Both:

    Is it ok just to handle links within a single site or there is also a need for links to external sites?

    Is the scenario covered by…

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 77 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 96 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Kentico Product Ideas » Content Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 212 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  13. 239 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  14. 28 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Kentico Product Ideas » Content Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  15. 180 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    22 comments  ·  Kentico Product Ideas » Content Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hello!

    We are currently trying to come up with the best model for enabling Content editors and Marketers to compose parts of pages using widgets also on MVC websites.

    What do you think about the following:

    1. The most important part is to enable business users (Content editors, Marketers) to add and configure components (widgets) in within specific areas (zones) on a page

    2. MVC developers know how to create layoyuts/templates and can do that on their onw, only need to be able to mark part of the layout as a widget area/zone

    3. MVC developers know how to implement reusable components. If there is a unified way to register such components with Kentico to be used in widget areas, there is no need to develop hundreds of out-of-the-box widgets.

    4. The biggest wish for Content editors and Marketersis to be able to influence a section of a specific page,…

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base